<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UV Light for Acrylic Nails Might Cause Skin Cancer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedermblog.com/2009/06/12/uv-light-for-acrylic-nails-might-cause-skin-cancer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedermblog.com/2009/06/12/uv-light-for-acrylic-nails-might-cause-skin-cancer/</link>
	<description>Smarter Skin Care</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:11:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://thedermblog.com/2009/06/12/uv-light-for-acrylic-nails-might-cause-skin-cancer/comment-page-1/#comment-37177</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedermblog.com/?p=1190#comment-37177</guid>
		<description>Nail drying UV lights are lower wattage than body tanning UV lights but they are used on smaller region. You need to look at watts per square inch of skin not total watts. Of course the duration of the exposer matters too. In general you should minimize your exposure to UV light. Since nails will dry just fine without UV light why take the risk?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nail drying UV lights are lower wattage than body tanning UV lights but they are used on smaller region. You need to look at watts per square inch of skin not total watts. Of course the duration of the exposer matters too. In general you should minimize your exposure to UV light. Since nails will dry just fine without UV light why take the risk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Getitstraight</title>
		<link>http://thedermblog.com/2009/06/12/uv-light-for-acrylic-nails-might-cause-skin-cancer/comment-page-1/#comment-34401</link>
		<dc:creator>Getitstraight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedermblog.com/?p=1190#comment-34401</guid>
		<description>Duwey is correct, NO UV light is used for acrylic nails. And most UV lamps used in the salons require either a 6 or 9 watt bulb. Gel nails cure within 2-3 minutes, and 2-3 layers are applied. Thats a total of 9 minutes max each hand would be under the UV lamp. Talk about Mis-informing people. Wow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duwey is correct, NO UV light is used for acrylic nails. And most UV lamps used in the salons require either a 6 or 9 watt bulb. Gel nails cure within 2-3 minutes, and 2-3 layers are applied. Thats a total of 9 minutes max each hand would be under the UV lamp. Talk about Mis-informing people. Wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duwey</title>
		<link>http://thedermblog.com/2009/06/12/uv-light-for-acrylic-nails-might-cause-skin-cancer/comment-page-1/#comment-30231</link>
		<dc:creator>duwey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedermblog.com/?p=1190#comment-30231</guid>
		<description>How can you compare tanning to a UV Gel process? People who tans would tan almost 2-3 times a week if not more. Your Acrylic Process is incorrect also. When Acrylics are applied onto nails, it does not require UV light to harden. The only thing to worry about acrylic nails are that some salons uses cheap liquid monomer that may contains a harmful chemical MMA (Methyl Methacrylate).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you compare tanning to a UV Gel process? People who tans would tan almost 2-3 times a week if not more. Your Acrylic Process is incorrect also. When Acrylics are applied onto nails, it does not require UV light to harden. The only thing to worry about acrylic nails are that some salons uses cheap liquid monomer that may contains a harmful chemical MMA (Methyl Methacrylate).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicki Zevola</title>
		<link>http://thedermblog.com/2009/06/12/uv-light-for-acrylic-nails-might-cause-skin-cancer/comment-page-1/#comment-28888</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicki Zevola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 04:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedermblog.com/?p=1190#comment-28888</guid>
		<description>Dear Dr. Benabio,

Is it true that the UV light emitted at nail salons is the same as that emitted by a tanning bed?

According to dermatologist Dr. Loretta Ciraldo, M.D. in the August 2008 issue of Oprah magazine,UVA light emitted by nail salon-type dryers is only 10-30 watts, which is significantly less than the 2400 watts or so emitted by a tanning bed.  

However, supposing Dr. Ciraldo is correct, is it possible for 10-30 watts to damage the nails in the manner suggested by the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center study?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Dr. Benabio,</p>
<p>Is it true that the UV light emitted at nail salons is the same as that emitted by a tanning bed?</p>
<p>According to dermatologist Dr. Loretta Ciraldo, M.D. in the August 2008 issue of Oprah magazine,UVA light emitted by nail salon-type dryers is only 10-30 watts, which is significantly less than the 2400 watts or so emitted by a tanning bed.  </p>
<p>However, supposing Dr. Ciraldo is correct, is it possible for 10-30 watts to damage the nails in the manner suggested by the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center study?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free E-book &#187; UV Light for Acrylic Nails Might Cause Skin Cancer</title>
		<link>http://thedermblog.com/2009/06/12/uv-light-for-acrylic-nails-might-cause-skin-cancer/comment-page-1/#comment-28878</link>
		<dc:creator>Free E-book &#187; UV Light for Acrylic Nails Might Cause Skin Cancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedermblog.com/?p=1190#comment-28878</guid>
		<description>[...] Here is the original post: UV Light for Acrylic Nails Might Cause Skin Cancer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here is the original post: UV Light for Acrylic Nails Might Cause Skin Cancer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jami</title>
		<link>http://thedermblog.com/2009/06/12/uv-light-for-acrylic-nails-might-cause-skin-cancer/comment-page-1/#comment-28875</link>
		<dc:creator>Jami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedermblog.com/?p=1190#comment-28875</guid>
		<description>Oh yay, just what I want to hear. *head desk* Skin cancer runs in my dad&#039;s side of the family. In fact, my grandma died of a brain tumor they believe started out as skin cancer. And yet, I&#039;m one of those &quot;I don&#039;t tan I BURN!&quot; types. Oy vey. 

Well, I get my nails done maybe twice a year if that anyway. Just for special occastions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yay, just what I want to hear. *head desk* Skin cancer runs in my dad&#8217;s side of the family. In fact, my grandma died of a brain tumor they believe started out as skin cancer. And yet, I&#8217;m one of those &#8220;I don&#8217;t tan I BURN!&#8221; types. Oy vey. </p>
<p>Well, I get my nails done maybe twice a year if that anyway. Just for special occastions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
