Home > Cosmetics, Women's Skin > Is Mineral Makeup Better for Your Skin?

Is Mineral Makeup Better for Your Skin?

August 4th, 2008

Cleopatra was 2,000 years ahead of her time. Mineral makeup, once used by ancient Egyptians, is now the hottest trend in cosmetics. But is it really healthier for your skin?

The concept of mineral makeup is brilliant in its simplicity.

  • Take natural minerals (which are pretty colors).
  • Pulverize them.
  • Package them in cute containers with brushes.
  • Market them as being so good for your skin that “you can sleep with it.”
  • Charge $50 for 0.005 cents worth of iron oxide.

While I work on developing Benabio’s Beryllonite Bronzer, let’s take a look at the claims that companies make:

  1. Mineral makeup contains only natural ingredients.
  2. Mineral makeup will have beneficial affects for your skin.

With regard to the first claim, there is no regulation for what constitutes a mineral makeup. Don’t be fooled by makeups labeled as “all natural minerals.” A company can put artificial fillers, preservatives, or dyes in a makeup, and so long as it contains minerals, they can claim it is mineral makeup.

The FDA does not check to see if the product contains natural minerals; it only monitors the makeup to ensure it is not harmful. There is no requirement for a company to validate claims that its makeup is natural.

Some minerals, such as bismouth oxychloride are actually not natural, but are manufactured (yup, that means artificial); yet, they are often included in natural mineral makeups.

Since mineral makeups usually are powders, they usually do not have the preservatives which are needed for cream or liquid makeups. This might be beneficial since these preservatives can cause irritations or allergies.

With regard to the second claim, there is no published evidence that mineral makeup has health benefits for your skin. Claims that makeups nourish your skin are unsubstantiated and unlikely. Because the minerals in makeup do not penetrate your skin, they cannot have any effect. Imagine it like this: if the minerals were beach sand, your skin would be a sponge. If you dusted some beach sand on the sponge there is no way that sand would penetrate to get to the other side.  It just sits on the surface. If you read carefully, many companies claim their makeup nourishes the skin but also claim that it won’t clog your pores. If the makeup won’t even get into huge pores on your skin, how could it possibly penetrate through skin?

The other thing to consider is that not all minerals are healthy. For example, asbestos, a natural occurring mineral, is carcinogenic and increases your risk of mesothelioma cancer. Talc, which is similar to asbestos, has also been scrutinized for possibly contributing to ovarian cancer and lung disease. Because of inhalation risks, we discourage parents from using talc on babies.

Last, mineral makeup might increase your risk of developing an allergy to metals, such as gold. Though typically unusual, allergy to gold has become more common since mineral makeups have become more popular.

Companies also claim that mineral makeup is a good sunscreen. It’s true that titanium dioxide and zinc oxide, which are often found in mineral makeup, are good physical sunscreens. However, because they’re a powder, they do not adhere to the skin and are easily brushed off. As a result, your actual ultraviolet light sun protection is less uniform and less effective than it would be with a cream.

Mineral makeup might be a great cosmetic — many women love products such as Bare Escentuals and others. They like the look and feel of these products. If you do too, then by all means use them.

If you don’t use mineral makeup, however, then don’t worry, you’re not missing anything.

Post written by Jeffrey Benabio, MD. You might also like:

A Mascara That Makes Your Eyelashes Grow

What’s A Good Eye Cream?

A Cure for Cellulite

Melanoma Rates Soar 50% for Young Women

Like this blog? Grab The Derm Feed

Photo credit: Craig Elliot

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • HealthRanker
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Print

  1. Aimee
    August 4th, 2008 at 06:11 | #1

    There are also a lot of reports of bismouth oxychloride causing cystic acne. I’ve found a few different brands to be too rough on the sensitive parts of my skin.

  2. August 4th, 2008 at 07:18 | #2

    No mineral makeup is 100% natural. For example, iron oxides must be purified in a lab, as the naturally occuring version contains heavy metals that are toxic without purification. Technically, that makes it synthetic, but it is a naturally derived ingredient.

    A responsible mineral makeup company will mention that both zinc oxide and titanium dioxide block UVA and UVB rays, and are very effective in doing so. But since the actual sunscreen protection varies widely depending on the percentage of both of these ingredients, as well as the application by the end user (one layer provides far less protection than someone who applies several layers), you are limited to describing the properties of the ingredients. Have you ever applied titanium dioxide or zinc oxide powder onto your skin, rubbed it in, and run it under water? It doesn’t rinse off very easily without rubbing it under water or washing with soap. Since you are not a woman, I assume it is a safe assumption that you’ve never applied mineral makeup. It is “buffed” onto your skin, or applied using a damp brush to meld the powders to your skin. They do not “brush off”, or none of us would have any makeup left on our faces after 5 minutes.

    As far as clogging pores, etc, it will vary by ingredients. Many of the larger, well known companies will use silicone derivitaves or parabens in their products as these are inexpensive fillers to bulk up products and give them a nice texture without any useful benefit (other than as a preservative). These CAN clog your pores, but ingredients that are not absorbed by the skin cannot – such as mica, titanium dioxide, and zinc oxide (the most common ingredients in mineral makeup).

    I have been unable to find any peer-reviewed articles that tie mineral makeup to increased allergies to gold. An article from the Washington Post that cites no source is not credible to me. Not only that, but all I could find was a reference that mineral makeup can abrade jewelry, increasing the release of gold particles onto the skin and the risk of contact dermatitis. The average woman does not apply makeup to her neckline, ear lobes, or hands, where one would be wearing jewelry. Please correct me if I am wrong, but one would also have to assume this is related to lower carat gold (ie 10K). Jewelry allergies/reactions can come from a multitude of reasons, some of which are listed here: http://www.skincare-news.com/articles.php?ArtID=511.

  3. August 4th, 2008 at 09:23 | #3

    Hi Dr. Benabio,
    I just came across your blog about mineral makeup and I totally agree with you on all your points. I’m a former Physical Therapist and 7 years ago I started making mineral based makeup in a cream form because of the same concern I had about relying on powder mineral cosmetics for sunscreen in facial cosmetics. Also your point about mineral makeup not penetrating the skin should help people understand that the claims about minerals “nourishing” the skin are just marketing tactics unsupported by good research. Mineral makeup in the dry form is great for applying over the top of a well formulated cream mineral sunscreen but if women rely upon a little dusting of it they are risking some serious sun damage. Thanks for the good information about mineral makeup.

  4. August 4th, 2008 at 18:56 | #4

    It’s good to know what the Mineral People don’t tell you. Cheers for the good read.

  5. August 5th, 2008 at 18:05 | #5

    Excellent article; you bring up many valid points on mineral makeups and the fact that there is much that is misunderstood. Good job!

  6. August 13th, 2008 at 11:51 | #6

    Interesting post! Thank you for debunking the “sleep in the makeup” hysteria. Mineral makeup can be quite lovely, but some folks sure think it’s a miracle it can’t possibly be!

    I also was interested to see the comment that mentioned that bismuth oxychloride may contribute to cystic acne. Now that I see that, I am thinking back to the raging cystic acne nightmares of my time with Bare Escentuals. Hmmm….

    I also have a sensitivity to bismuth oxychloride that makes me shiny and itchy – not an uncommon complaint for users of products that include this salt in large quantities.

  7. October 7th, 2008 at 16:34 | #7

    I’m curious as to what you think about high frequency and galvanic machines used in spa’s?

  8. October 12th, 2008 at 05:16 | #8

    Interesting read with valid points made!

  9. Denise
    November 1st, 2008 at 08:35 | #9

    I use mineral makeup. It works for me because it helps me to control the horrible oily skin I’ve had all my life. I had the most dreadful acne that left scars on my light-skinned African-American skin that was embarrassing and ugly. I started using powder makeup because liquid makeup did nothing for my oily skin. Yes, I know that not everything in mineral makeups are not pure; however, they usually contain less ingredients and no perservitives. I know about the bismuth, but I am not allergic to it. I always use a moisturizer with SPF 30 for UV protection. It’s not perfect, for instance, Bare Minerals has no color that matches the gold undertones in my skin. I should use medium tan but it has a cool/neutral base that doesn’t match. I use another makeup from a different company that matches. I’m waiting for BE to make a shade that matches my skin because I like their makeup the best.

  10. November 2nd, 2008 at 00:05 | #10

    This is fine post and the mineral cosmetic products are the better for skin and these also contain best ingredients for the skin like calciums and other vitamins necessary for the skin .

  11. Michelle
    November 4th, 2008 at 00:55 | #11

    Hi,

    I came across your blog after searching online for blogs posted by dermatologists. The existence of such blogs dawned on me when I read a comment posted on http://www.TruthInAging.com, another cosmetic/skin beauty blog that I found online. It seems very interesting and helpful with the product reviews that are posted daily. You might want to check it out.

    On another one, I wanted to know your opinion on Bellapierre and Micabella make-up. It has become quite popular and sold in kiosks at the mall. I couldn’t find the ingredients in the mineral make-up online. I was wondering if these brands are safe and trustworthy? They claim to contain 100 % natural ingredients whereas Bare Minerals has 2% of chemicals in their products. I was wondering if this is true, or which product is the safer one to use. I noticed that the dust/powder is more likely to enter the nostrils through application, is this unsafe over time? Thank you!

  12. November 6th, 2008 at 14:24 | #12

    great post.
    one should never sleep in any cosmetic.
    i am very allergic to bismuth oxychloride and recently have taken the plunge into a “green” & vegan lifestyle. i really love afterglow’s line of mineral cosmetics because it is fun & fabulous but doesn’t irritate my sensitive skin. they also use certified organic ingredients like grape seed extract, and jojoba, whenever possible.

    –lauren

  13. Rachael
    November 30th, 2008 at 11:51 | #13

    Very interesting… Dont you just love the way these cosmetic companies claim you can sleep with Bismuth Oxychloride on your face??

  14. December 3rd, 2008 at 08:34 | #14

    Larenim (Mineral spelled backwards) contains no Bismuth oxychloride: a by-product of lead; responsible for enlarging pores. One will likely discover this after a couple of years of using makeup that contains bismuth (maybe sooner.) Larenim goes on like silk and has a great color selection: C (cool), N (neutral) & W (warm: about 75% of the US population falls under this family of colors with yellow undertones.) For the T-zone area (& a great primer under color), we love “Dusk til Dawn” treatment which contains Kaolin clay (to absorb excess oil), Zinc (which naturally brightens,) & Green Tea (infusing the skin with anti-oxidants all day) That’s it…Just the good stuff!

  15. June 28th, 2009 at 10:08 | #15

    Isnt this another way to drown the things?

  16. Sølvi
    September 1st, 2009 at 15:26 | #16

    @Robyn About; Silicone
    Silicone has lots of useful qualities;

    1. Good electrical insulation. Because silicone can be formulated to be electrically insulative or conductive, it is suitable for a wide range of electrical applications.
    2. Thermal stability (constancy of properties over a wide operating range of ?100 to 250 °C).
    3. Though not a hydrophobe, the ability to repel water and form watertight seals.
    4. Excellent resistance to oxygen, ozone and UV light (sunlight). This has led to widespread use in the construction industry (e.g. coatings, fire protection, glazing seals), and automotive industry (external gaskets, external trim).
    5. Non-stick.
    6. Low chemical reactivity.
    7. Low toxicity, but does not support microbiological growth.
    8. High gas permeability: at room temperature (25 °C) the permeability of silicone rubber for gases like oxygen is approximately 400 times that of butyl rubber, making silicone useful for medical applications (though precluding it from applications where gas-tight seals are necessary).
    - Wikipedia

    The skin has very good of layer with the silicone if the skin is dehydrated.
    It holds the water on the skin to grease the skin and hold the damp inside, and its breathe.
    The silicone is to big for the skin så the products are safe.
    the skin. I mean it is a better choice than products with oil in it, because the oil isn´t breathe.
    They have a wonderful character to protect the skin. It protect the skin from humidify, dust, pollution, it is like sunprotector, and it dont go in the skin.

    :)

  17. November 9th, 2009 at 14:12 | #17

    seriously, this blog is Totally Rad . I think im gonna stick around and read some of your posts. sincerely

  1. No trackbacks yet.